Several pharmaceutical businesses forecast the need for coronavirus booster vaccinations (COVID-19). The demand for these booster doses comes as the highly infectious B16172 delta form, which is responsible for many breakthrough COVID-19 cases, spreads across the country. On the other hand, booster shots appear to be another way for vaccine manufacturers to increase earnings.
The pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna have been the most vociferous in advocating for booster dosages. Their mRNA vaccines were highly efficient against older SARS-CoV-2 strains but less effective against the delta variation.
Based in New York, Pfizer recently claimed record revenues from its BNT162b2 vaccine, which was developed in collaboration with BioNTech of Germany.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said vaccinated persons would “certainly” need vaccine booster shots every year to retain immunity during a virtual event in April 2021. “The varieties will be crucial. “It’s critical to reduce the number of people who could be infected with the virus,” he said.
According to Bourla, some vaccines, such as those for polio, require only one dosage, while others, such as those for influenza, require yearly vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 “looks more like the influenza virus than the poliovirus,” he said, while the COVID-19 vaccine falls into the second category.
Dr Ozlem Tureci, BioNTech’s co-founder and chief medical officer, had similar feelings about booster shots. So in April 2021, she informed CNBC’s Kelly Evans that yearly COVID-19 booster dosages should be expected.
Scientists expected vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2 to decline with time, according to Tureci. “We observe evidence for this… not just in the induced [reaction], but also in the natural immunological response to SARS-CoV-2,” says the researcher. In addition, we see this diminishing of immune responses in persons who have recently been sick, so it’s to be expected with [COVID-19] vaccines,” she told Evans.
Meanwhile, Moderna President Stephen Hoge supported booster shots, claiming that patients at high risk of serious illness may require them. He estimates that 30 per cent of the people in the United States will refuse COVID-19 immunizations. According to Hoge, this vaccination apprehension, together with the widespread distribution of the delta form, justified the necessity for booster doses to maintain high protection levels. (See also: Big Pharma pushes for coronavirus booster doses, with no end in sight.)
Scientists, on the other hand, have questioned the need for these booster doses.
Many experts have objected to the concept of giving booster shots to the general public, claiming a lack of evidence. However, while the general population may not require booster injections in the meantime, more vulnerable groups such as the elderly and organ transplant recipients may need them, according to scientists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in June 2021.
Nonetheless, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) determined that booster shots may be required if vaccine immunity declines or if a new variation impairs the effectiveness of current immunizations.
According to Dr Sarah Oliver, co-chair of the ACIP’s COVID-19 working committee, booster doses were only suggested to the CDC after “evidence of diminishing protection.” However, booster shots may be advantageous for patients with compromised immune systems, according to a recent study by Johns Hopkins University researchers. Given the study’s findings, Oliver suggested that the agency keep an eye on residents of long-term care institutions, the elderly, healthcare workers, and persons with compromised immune systems.
“I would have to concur with the working group’s assessment, in the sense that there is no data to support recommendations… [for] boosters at this time,” ACIP member Dr Sharon Frey stated. She did agree, though, to give a third booster dose to transplant patients or if outbreak illnesses become more common in the general community.
“I believe the only thing we can do at this point is watching for an increase in reinfection or new illnesses in persons who have been vaccinated,” Frey added. (Related: If covid vaccinations are effective, why do “booster” shots need to be given?)
Before COVID-19 booster doses are suggested, further proof of breakthrough cases is needed, according to Dr Grace Lee, chairperson of the ACIP safety group. “If we’re talking about boosting before we know what the risk data would look like, I’d prefer more clarification on the safety data. “I believe decision-making continues forward even if there is a doubt with the safety evidence if we are witnessing significant breakthrough cases,” she said.
“Decisions on booster shots will be best made by public health professionals, rather than CEOs of a firm who may benefit financially,” said Dr Monica Gandhi of the University of California, San Francisco.
As a result, several governments have been increasingly rigorous in their efforts to reduce the number of new corona cases as the Delta variant sweeps the globe.
The Australian government threatens its people: There will be no freedom until vaccination shot quotas are met
As they continue to politicize the COVID-19 pandemic to take power, Western liberals demonstrate that they are no different from dictators and tyrants in the first, second, and third worlds.
In the United States, one Democrat-run city after another has begun to issue mandates that citizens must prove they have received the vaccine. If not, they will not be allowed to participate in society fully, creating a vaccine “caste system” of privileged vaxxers versus an unprivileged underclass of second-class citizens who must remain hidden and out of the mainstream. This is similar to the vaccine “caste system” of privileged vaxxers versus an unprivileged underclass of second-class citizens who must stay remote and out of the mainstream.
The federal government is following suit. Joe Biden, the regime’s ruler, has made it mandatory for all government employees to acquire the vaccine or face being forced to do a painful COVID test every week if they wish to keep their jobs.
New lockdowns across Europe provoke enormous protests and unrest in countries such as the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Germany.
As the ‘Delta variation’ of COVID-19 spreads in Australia, the government is employing the military to enforce additional mandatory lockdowns (albeit it’s not nearly as lethal as the original strain, and the vast majority of infected people are simply having moderate symptoms).
In Australia, though, things are even worse: Now, the government is requiring a certain number of people to be vaccinated before the entire citizenry can be ‘given’ their rights back, demonstrating the wisdom of America’s founders, who wrote a Constitution that recognizes and protects inalienable rights that government cannot give or take away.
According to Reuters:
Even as new illnesses remain around a 16-month-high, Australian authorities said they could reduce a COVID-19 curfew that requires Sydney’s five million residents to stay home until the end of August if half the population is vaccinated.
While the state reported 199 locally COVID-19 cases in the past 24 hours on Tuesday, close to a 16-month high of 239 infections in one day last week, Premier Gladys Berejiklian said restrictions could be eased if six million people in New South Wales are vaccinated by the time the lockdown ends.
“With at least one or two doses, six million jabs is nearly half the population,” Berejiklian told reporters in Sydney last week. “That provides us more alternatives for how life will be on August 29th.”
This is despotism in its purest form. Rights are rights, regardless of whether a virus is sweeping the country, if a meteor shower is in progress or whether Earth is being assaulted by little green guys from two galaxies away.
At least, that’s what the term “inalienable” means in the American Constitution. While Western countries are based on American-style liberty, they are not identical governments, as Australia has demonstrated.
Furthermore, Australians face a problem quite similar to the reason for vaccine apprehension in the United States: disinformation.
“Although Australia has largely kept its COVID-19 numbers low, with just over 34,500 cases and 925 deaths,” Reuters added, “Its vaccination rollout has hit several roadblocks due to changing medical advice on AstraZeneca (AZN.L) doses over blood clot concerns and supply constraints for Pfizer (PFE.N) inoculation.”
Meanwhile, the outbreak in Australia has been relatively modest, with just approximately 35,000 cases and less than 1,000 deaths. But that doesn’t matter since the western leftists in charge of that country are the same as other Western leftists, authoritarians who don’t care about science.’ And it makes little difference what the lockdowns are due to ordinary Australians, as long as their elitist government rulers live in luxury and are well-cared for.
“The Australian economy is anticipated to contract in the current quarter as a result of the Sydney lockdown, and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has warned that the length of the stay-at-home orders will determine if a recession can be avoided”, according to Reuters.
The West is being overtaken by tyrants, waiting for COVID to provide them with a political opportunity.
According to the media, people dismissed for refusing covid “vaccines” may be denied unemployment benefits.
As more multinational corporations based in the United States require their employees to be “vaccinated” for COVID-19 to keep their jobs, many people wonder if being fired for not complying with Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” scheme disqualifies them from receiving unemployment benefits. Unfortunately, the answer, according to the mainstream media, is yes.
Employees of Disney, Walmart, Tyson, and other behemoth companies fired for refusing to take the vaccine will not be eligible for unemployment benefits. According to a COVID-19 report, a small group of lawyers has decided that worker protection laws no longer apply to the non-injected.
Corona Virus injection mandates at the corporate level, according to Diane Seltzer of The Seltzer Law Firm and John T. Harrington of The Employment Law Group, are a type of “business policy” that can result in an individual being dismissed for refusing to comply.
According to the research, “in most locations of the United States, if you are fired for violating a corporate policy, you are not eligible for unemployment benefits or payments.”
Using the example of a company dress code, Harrington claims that refusing to roll up one’s sleeve is a kind of “insubordination” and “misconduct” that “would likely prevent you from obtaining unemployment benefits.”
“Even something as simple as a dress code that requires you to wear a tie because it is business policy, and you say, ‘I don’t believe in wearing ties, so I’m not going to do it.’ That, according to Harrington, is insubordination.
Fired for not getting a covid vaccine? SUE!
You’ve been fired because you didn’t obtain a covid vaccine? SUE!
Of course, this is simply Harrington’s opinion, and it reflects his clear bias in favour of Chinese Virus injections. For every Harrington on the planet, there are at least two or three non-Harringtons who would argue the opposite.
Whether or not the injections in question have full approval or only “emergency usage authorization,” one’s injection status is a personal matter (EUA). Nobody, employer or not, has the legal authority to deny someone the opportunity to work because they refuse to be pierced with a chemical needle from Big Pharma.
It appears that the Harringtons of the world, together with their media allies, are attempting to terrify Americans into believing that there are no legal safeguards in place to protect them against medical dictatorship. The truth is that if people are prepared to use them, there are safeguards in place.
Regardless of what Harrington claims, American employees have the right to seek unemployment benefits. At the very least, Seltzer accepted this, stating that terminated staff can still fill out the form, apply, and defend their case — but she still maintains that refusing a Chinese Virus injection is “severe misconduct.”
Another consideration is exemptions, including personal, philosophical, religious, and medical objections to compulsory vaccination with experimental DNA-modifying chemicals, depending on your state.
Americans who would rather not have their immune systems permanently destroyed and their God-given DNA altered can apply for and use an exemption, which exempts them from ever having to take a shot as a condition of employment. Everyone who has access to these exemptions will most likely want to use them immediately.
SOURCES:
